Docta Ignorantia LXV
Homeschooling
By David R. Graham
Thanks much for the Homeschooling article from WSJ. They are right on
the point that hs'ers are politically active, at least many of them.
Between about '85 and '95 Mary and I were very effective in expanding
educational opportunities for everyone, especially via electronic network. We got
a lot done locally, state-wide and nationally developing what we called
shared-schooling, which meant mixing web-based, public school-based,
private school-based and homeschool-based resources. Doing education
without faction.
The particular question focused by this WSJ article is that of standards
and on that we tried, without immediate success, to get a reasonable,
non-factional approach coordinated. We pointed out to hs'ers of all
factions -- we don't belong to any faction and talk comfortably with all
-- that, for a number of reasons, which we detailed, some sort of
standard has to be articulated. We said that if we don't do it it will
be done for us and we might not like what that is. We said that hs'ers
should be proactive in restoring our entire system of education by
promoting the essential values of hs-ing.
But interestingly, our pleas not only were ignored, they were branded
the first steps of a fascist march to conformity and away from freedom.
Fear of government people was rampant. The barrage came with equal
vigor from both the secular and the so-called religious wings of the hs
movement and spared neither our persons nor our accomplishments.
Of course, the march of events, as we said it would, bore us out on this
need to articulate what we as educators are after and to offer our
successes as help to other educators.
We said that hs-ing is mainstream education. We said that the movement
needed not a set of standards but simply an accurate statement of what
is an educated person. My suggestion was: "An educated person is one
who has cultured taste, who can distinguish between the eternal and the
ephemeral." I also spoke of education as training the heart to be clean
and the hand to be skilled.
However, hs'ers violently opposed the idea that hs-ing is mainstream
education. Reasoned discussion was overborne by posturing and so we
left the posturers to their own devices.
By the late 90s the hs movement's visible leadership was in the hands of
people having primarily political or commercial interests. As you know,
neither of these interests must guide education, which nonetheless is
responsible for teaching their proper use, which includes serving
education but not guiding it.
We had already started processes which of their own intrinsic logic
would produce the attitudes and articulations we envisioned. Events
necessarily bear us out. Nature insists on the natural, one way or
another, sooner or later. So there is redeveloping among people --
because it is their nature -- a sense of what is an educated person and
that the inate and inalienable calling of each personality is critically
important to that personality and to society as a whole -- and so must
be led out (ex ducare) and fostered.
Significantly, the Army is just now seeking articulation of the
accomplishments of hs'ers so as to recognize their traits and certify
them fit for service. This is a welcome development to me and a very
unwelcome development to the left wing of our hs colleagues. Our right
wing hs colleagues -- so-called religious hs'ers (I am disinclined to
credit them with being religious) -- appear to be welcoming this
initiative from the Army. I probably would not approve the reasons they
are welcoming it, not that that matters to them! :-)
Recently I reminded our left wing hs colleagues that I had forecast this
development 15 years ago and recommended that we welcome and seek to
assist the Army/military by offering encouragement and useful
articulations -- the same recommendation I had made 15 years ago in a
general sense. The deafening, anti-military silence which has greeted
my reminder and recommendation was anticipated but still disappointing.
So life goes on. It just happens that Mary and I have lived rather
close to the beating heart of this particular aspect of it,
homeschooling, and have a very happy sense of having accomplished and/or
foreshadowed significant benefit for our system of education. Our
manifesto on the subject, dating from 1989, is still valid:
Adwaitha Hermitage
May 6, 2000
DI TOC
|