Docta Ignorantia LXVII
Evidence
By David R. Graham
When we see that everything is attached to the Ground, we do not ask for
evidence because we see it. We are adwaitins, non-dualists.
When we see that some things are attached to the Ground, occasions arise
when we feel a need for evidence and we dig it up ourselves. We are
vashista-adwaitins, qualified non-dualists.
When we see only things without attachments -- and, obviously, we don't
see the Ground -- we feel a continual need for evidence and pester any
and all to provide it for us. We are dualists. However, operationally,
the only evidence we will accept is that generated by our own senses and
even this we don't trust because we know the senses to be among the
world's crudest and least reliable evidence gatherers because their
operation is closely affected by realms of the personality which have
little and often negative interest in evidence collection. And even
when we get evidence, it doesn't give lasting stability because, lacking
sight of the Ground and everything's connection to It, we are unable to
grasp its integration. When we are dualists, therefore, our requests
for evidence are trivial.
There is one other circumstance in which we ask for evidence. That is
the occasion upon which our fundamental stochastic structure has
received such a jolt from the reverberations of a fresh insight that our
entire cognitive array is temporarily -- and usually seriously --
destabilized while we look for the whats, wherefores and wheretos.
Adwaitha Hermitage
September 25, 1997
DI TOC
|